Which description correctly defines per se contraband?

Which description correctly defines per se contraband?

• A. It applies to property inherently illegal to possess
• B. It applies to all property seized in a crime
• C. It refers only to money
• D. It is another term for proceeds

Answer: (A)

Per se contraband means property that is illegal to possess in itself, regardless of how it is used in a crime. That makes the description of property inherently illegal to possess the best fit. Not every item seized in a crime is per se contraband—only those that are illegal to possess under law. It isn’t limited to money, and it isn’t the same as proceeds, which are funds derived from criminal activity and may be forfeitable under a separate basis. For example, illegal drugs are contraband per se, while cash linked to a crime may be seized as proceeds rather than per se contraband.

Per se contraband means property that is illegal to possess in itself, regardless of how it is used in a crime. That makes the description of property inherently illegal to possess the best fit. Not every item seized in a crime is per se contraband—only those that are illegal to possess under law. It isn’t limited to money, and it isn’t the same as proceeds, which are funds derived from criminal activity and may be forfeitable under a separate basis. For example, illegal drugs are contraband per se, while cash linked to a crime may be seized as proceeds rather than per se contraband.